Signal now documents registration without a phone number, as "Phone Numberless Registration for Android". The comparison table still said No for Signal, glossed "A number is required to register". That is the same stale-in-our-own-favour scoring the page already admits to in its post-quantum paragraph, pointed at a competitor this time.
What changed
The row is now Partly, naming what the registration actually is: new accounts on Android, paid, and no way for an account that already has a number to drop it.
The lede no longer claims we are alone in not asking for a number, because we are not. What is still only ours is that it costs nothing and needs no app store account.
Both languages. The sources list gains the support article; the checked-date moves to September 2026.
What could not be verified
This machine cannot resolve support.signal.org and the in-app browser is blocked from it, so Signal's own article was never read. The price and the accepted payment methods are therefore left off the page rather than taken from a news write-up, especially as the two secondary sources disagree on the payment rail. They agree it is a paid registration, which is the only part the row asserts. Worth filling in from a machine that can reach it.
The test
ComparisonClaimsTests renders both languages and pins the claim. Nothing rendered the Spanish page before: PublicPagesTests reads those templates as text, which catches a broken link and not a template that fails to render, and the SEO suite renders /comparison alone. Falsified by putting the old Spanish sentence back, which fails on /es/comparison by name.
Signal now documents registration without a phone number, as "Phone Numberless Registration for Android". The comparison table still said **No** for Signal, glossed "A number is required to register". That is the same stale-in-our-own-favour scoring the page already admits to in its post-quantum paragraph, pointed at a competitor this time.
### What changed
- The row is now **Partly**, naming what the registration actually is: new accounts on Android, paid, and no way for an account that already has a number to drop it.
- The lede no longer claims we are alone in not asking for a number, because we are not. What is still only ours is that it costs nothing and needs no app store account.
- Both languages. The sources list gains the support article; the checked-date moves to September 2026.
### What could not be verified
This machine cannot resolve `support.signal.org` and the in-app browser is blocked from it, so Signal's own article was never read. The price and the accepted payment methods are therefore **left off the page** rather than taken from a news write-up, especially as the two secondary sources disagree on the payment rail. They agree it is a paid registration, which is the only part the row asserts. Worth filling in from a machine that can reach it.
### The test
`ComparisonClaimsTests` renders both languages and pins the claim. Nothing rendered the Spanish page before: `PublicPagesTests` reads those templates as **text**, which catches a broken link and not a template that fails to render, and the SEO suite renders `/comparison` alone. Falsified by putting the old Spanish sentence back, which fails on `/es/comparison` by name.
---
**752 tests in 77 suites, no failures.**
🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)
added 3 commits
<ul><li>a0e9e0c0...3f0e24bc - 2 commits from branch <code>main</code></li><li>b50a2dbe - Stop saying Signal requires a phone number to register</li></ul>
[Compare with previous version](/paulhitt/flamenet-relay/-/merge_requests/161/diffs?diff_id=2053875759&start_sha=a0e9e0c08406c92dc0afdf171a5133ec4e351290)
Blocking a user prevents them from interacting with repositories, such as opening or commenting on pull requests or issues. Learn more about blocking a user.
Signal now documents registration without a phone number, as "Phone Numberless Registration for Android". The comparison table still said No for Signal, glossed "A number is required to register". That is the same stale-in-our-own-favour scoring the page already admits to in its post-quantum paragraph, pointed at a competitor this time.
What changed
What could not be verified
This machine cannot resolve
support.signal.organd the in-app browser is blocked from it, so Signal's own article was never read. The price and the accepted payment methods are therefore left off the page rather than taken from a news write-up, especially as the two secondary sources disagree on the payment rail. They agree it is a paid registration, which is the only part the row asserts. Worth filling in from a machine that can reach it.The test
ComparisonClaimsTestsrenders both languages and pins the claim. Nothing rendered the Spanish page before:PublicPagesTestsreads those templates as text, which catches a broken link and not a template that fails to render, and the SEO suite renders/comparisonalone. Falsified by putting the old Spanish sentence back, which fails on/es/comparisonby name.752 tests in 77 suites, no failures.
🤖 Generated with Claude Code
added 3 commits
mainb50a2dbe- Stop saying Signal requires a phone number to registerCompare with previous version
mentioned in commit
5503e3dab0