Paul HittandClaude Opus 5.5 eb9b7647b3 Play games in one-to-one chats: the rules, sending, receiving and notices
A game lives on its start message's history row as the log alone, so it
follows that row through off the record (memory only), delete, the
disappearing timer and the backup. Everything else is replayed from the
log with the capped engine replay.

Receiving follows §6.33 rules 1 to 4: an unknown game is rebuilt from
the envelope; a stale or duplicate log changes nothing; a log that
disagrees, a peer adding a ply for this person's side, an illegal or
malformed move, or a log over the cap marks the game out of step, which
is sticky. Endings follow DESIGN items 16, 22 and 23: an ending is judged
at the log its gend carries, once that log is in step; a draw offer
counts only from the side that has just moved, at the receiver's whole
log, and the next move lapses it; decline and cancel count only until
the invitee's first move in that log; a decline for a game this phone
never saw rebuilds it as the game it started, declined.

Moves and endings go out announced, so the other phone wakes (item 15),
and are never queued: one that reaches nobody, a contact with no device
included, is taken back (item 24). The start is queued like a card.
Their move notifies without a sound, "Your move: chess with Sam"; an
ending says "<Game> with <name>: <result>"; a draw offer "<name> offers
a draw: <Game>"; a refused offer says nothing; a snoozed chat holds them
all. A game from another server, or from this account's own other
device, is never a board.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-04 08:53:43 -04:00
2026-08-21 18:22:30 -04:00
2026-08-21 18:22:30 -04:00
2026-08-21 18:22:30 -04:00
2026-09-09 09:30:32 -04:00
2026-09-09 09:30:32 -04:00

Flamenet Messenger. Android

The Android app, and the two libraries under it. The product's site is at https://flamenetmessenger.com.

engine/   the protocol: X3DH, Double Ratchet, sealed sender, safety numbers,
          key transparency. Plain Kotlin/JVM, no Android in it at all.
client/   the relay transport: HTTP, auth, the §8 routes.
app/      the Compose app.
interop/  the cross-engine driver; not shipped.

engine and client are deliberately plain JVM libraries. The protocol has nothing to do with Android, and keeping it off the platform means their tests run anywhere a JVM does, no SDK, no emulator, no device, which is also what lets them gate in CI on Linux:

./gradlew :engine:test :client:test

The app's own unit tests need the Android SDK but still no emulator (Robolectric):

./gradlew :app:testDebugUnitTest

Where it stands

PARITY.md is the definition of done for this app, read that, not this. Every row there names the iOS file it came from so it can be re-checked rather than trusted. Headlines: messaging, groups, attachments, voice notes, stories, calls, sealed sender, key transparency and the encrypted vault are built and tested, and a cross-platform round trip against iOS is verified.

If a claim here ever disagrees with PARITY.md or with the tree, believe those, and fix this.

Why the engine came first, and is held to the vectors

An Android client needs the protocol implemented a third time, and the third implementation is the one that finds the places where the specification says less than the two existing engines quietly agreed on, but only if it is written against the spec and the published vectors rather than against a reading of our own Swift and JavaScript. So the engine is held to test/vectors/protocol-v1.json in flamenet-e2e, the same file the other two engines are checked against, read from that repository rather than copied here, because a copied vector file drifts and a drifting vector file stops being a check. PublishedVectorsTest looks for it beside this checkout and fails loudly if it cannot find it; FLAMENET_VECTORS overrides the search.

Two implementations that agree may both be wrong in the same way, especially when one was written while reading the other. The audit-path ordering in §19 is the worked example: a top-down reading of a bottom-up path produces the correct root for every left-spine index, so it passes any test that only checks index 0. The vector file pins a right-descending index for that reason, and the Kotlin tests assert both that the published path verifies and that the same path reversed does not.

If this engine ever disagrees with the file, the interesting question is which of the three is wrong, not this one by default.

Contributing and security

  • CONTRIBUTING.md, building (JDK 21, JAVA_HOME is not optional on a Mac), the test gate, and the platform traps that cost an hour each.
  • PARITY.md, what iOS does, what this does, and what is left. It is the definition of done for this app.
  • SECURITY.md, threat model and where to send a vulnerability report. Not an issue tracker matter: security@flamenetmessenger.com.
S
Description
Flamenet Messenger for Android — the Kotlin engine, held to the published protocol vectors. No app yet. MIT.
Readme MIT
22 MiB
Languages
Kotlin 99.3%
Shell 0.6%
Python 0.1%