Paul HittandClaude Opus 5 91a46b4d2a A call asks for the microphone, which nothing on that path ever did
A call is a microphone the moment it starts, and no call path asked for
one. `CAMERA` was requested for video calls; `RECORD_AUDIO` was requested
only by the voice-note button. So anybody who had never recorded a voice
note had never granted it, and every call they placed or answered hit:

  SecurityException: Starting FGS with type microphone ...
  requires android.permission.RECORD_AUDIO

The throw is caught and logged, and the call then carries on with no
microphone. The far end hears nothing and it ends looking like the call
"just went away", which is exactly how it has been described. A clean
install placing its first call reproduces it every time.

`rememberMicThen` asks first, and a refusal is respected rather than
worked around: the call is not placed, because a call nobody can hear is
worse than no call. Placing from a conversation and both answer paths go
through it.

Also: an error raised anywhere but Home was invisible. `phase.error` was
drawn inside `SignedIn`, which is the Home tab and nothing else, so a
failure on Stories, Messages, Calls, Files, Wallet or Account explained
itself to an empty room. It moves up beside the call banner, which is
already there for the same reason: it belongs wherever the person is
standing when it happens.

Verified on the emulator with RECORD_AUDIO denied: tapping Call now
raises the system prompt where it used to proceed silently, and after
granting, the call runs with no SecurityException.

1474 unit tests green.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-09-18 07:12:23 -04:00
2026-09-16 20:44:23 -04:00
2026-08-21 18:22:30 -04:00
2026-08-21 18:22:30 -04:00
2026-08-21 18:22:30 -04:00
2026-08-21 18:22:30 -04:00
2026-08-21 18:22:30 -04:00
2026-09-09 09:30:32 -04:00
2026-09-09 16:58:55 -04:00
2026-09-09 09:30:32 -04:00

Flamenet Messenger. Android

The Android app, and the two libraries under it. The product's site is at https://flamenetmessenger.com.

engine/   the protocol: X3DH, Double Ratchet, sealed sender, safety numbers,
          key transparency. Plain Kotlin/JVM — no Android in it at all.
client/   the relay transport: HTTP, auth, the §8 routes.
app/      the Compose app.
interop/  the cross-engine driver; not shipped.

engine and client are deliberately plain JVM libraries. The protocol has nothing to do with Android, and keeping it off the platform means their tests run anywhere a JVM does, no SDK, no emulator, no device, which is also what lets them gate in CI on Linux:

./gradlew :engine:test :client:test

The app's own unit tests need the Android SDK but still no emulator (Robolectric):

./gradlew :app:testDebugUnitTest

Where it stands

PARITY.md is the definition of done for this app, read that, not this. Every row there names the iOS file it came from so it can be re-checked rather than trusted. Headlines: messaging, groups, attachments, voice notes, stories, calls, sealed sender, key transparency and the encrypted vault are built and tested, and a cross-platform round trip against iOS is verified.

If a claim here ever disagrees with PARITY.md or with the tree, believe those, and fix this.

Why the engine came first, and is held to the vectors

An Android client needs the protocol implemented a third time, and the third implementation is the one that finds the places where the specification says less than the two existing engines quietly agreed on, but only if it is written against the spec and the published vectors rather than against a reading of our own Swift and JavaScript. So the engine is held to test/vectors/protocol-v1.json in flamenet-e2e, the same file the other two engines are checked against, read from that repository rather than copied here, because a copied vector file drifts and a drifting vector file stops being a check. PublishedVectorsTest looks for it beside this checkout and fails loudly if it cannot find it; FLAMENET_VECTORS overrides the search.

Two implementations that agree may both be wrong in the same way, especially when one was written while reading the other. The audit-path ordering in §19 is the worked example: a top-down reading of a bottom-up path produces the correct root for every left-spine index, so it passes any test that only checks index 0. The vector file pins a right-descending index for that reason, and the Kotlin tests assert both that the published path verifies and that the same path reversed does not.

If this engine ever disagrees with the file, the interesting question is which of the three is wrong, not this one by default.

Contributing and security

  • CONTRIBUTING.md, building (JDK 21, JAVA_HOME is not optional on a Mac), the test gate, and the platform traps that cost an hour each.
  • PARITY.md, what iOS does, what this does, and what is left. It is the definition of done for this app.
  • SECURITY.md, threat model and where to send a vulnerability report. Not an issue tracker matter: security@flamenetmessenger.com.
S
Description
Flamenet Messenger for Android — the Kotlin engine, held to the published protocol vectors. No app yet. MIT.
Readme MIT
22 MiB
Languages
Kotlin 99.3%
Shell 0.6%
Python 0.1%