A live test for the file round trip, and four published passwords #85

Merged
paulhitt merged 2 commits from test/live-file-transfer into main 2026-09-04 20:50:19 +00:00
2 Commits
Author SHA1 Message Date
Paul HittandClaude Opus 5 ead31053a4 A live test for the file round trip, and four published passwords
`LiveFileTransferTest` covers the one seam nothing else does: a document
leaving one vault, crossing a real relay, and arriving in another's with
its label intact. `FileShareWireTest` proves the envelope's shape and
`LocalVaultTest` proves the vault at both ends; neither puts a byte on a
wire.

⚠️ **Written, compiles, UNRUN** — the same state `LiveSignUpFleetTest` is
in, and the same caveat applies: an unrun test proves nothing. It creates
accounts, so it needs a throwaway relay and an explicit decision to point
it at one.

🔴 **Writing it surfaced four published passwords and a guard that could
not see them.**

`TestSafetyTest` exists to stop a credential being written into a suite
that creates real accounts. It matched `val X = "…"` only. So:

- `LiveConversationTest` passed the literal straight as an ARGUMENT,
  twice — invisible to the check.
- `LiveSignUpTest`, `LiveKeyLogTest` and `LiveSealedSenderTest` wrote
  `password = "…"` on its own line inside a multi-line argument list, the
  most ordinary Kotlin formatting there is — also invisible.

I copied the same literal into the new suite before noticing, which is
how I found it.

**A guard that passes while the thing it guards against is present in the
tree is worse than no guard, because it is read as evidence.** All five
call sites now read `LiveTarget.passphrase()` from the environment with no
fallback, and announce a SKIP when it is unset.

The check itself took two wrong turns worth recording:

- Skipping every named argument, to avoid flagging
  `product = "messenger"` — which let the three `password = "…"` suites
  through. Trading one blind spot for another is not a fix; a named
  argument is now judged by its NAME.
- Widening the sign-up match to a few lines around the call — which
  flagged forty test tags, assertion messages and message bodies as
  credentials. That is how a check stops being read, so it is same-line
  only, and rule 1 covers the multi-line case properly.

"secret" was dropped from the credential names for the same reason: test
prose is full of it, and a marker string called `secret` is a fixture.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-09-04 16:28:11 -04:00
Paul HittandClaude Opus 5 e6913ae60e PARITY: history at rest was already built — the third stale row
Marked ⚪ and implemented the whole time. Every read goes to disk:
`Session.history` calls `Vault.history`, which decrypts the record. There
is no in-memory copy to be fooled by.

Checked against iOS's `E2EHistoryStore` rather than assumed. Same cipher,
same posture, two honest differences recorded rather than papered over:

- 🟢 Android binds the RECORD NAME into the AAD, so a sealed blob cannot
  be moved between slots. iOS keeps one snapshot file and does not need
  that — but would, the day it splits.
- iOS's `.completeFileProtection` is a per-file assertion. Android's
  equivalent is Credential-Encrypted storage, a property of the volume
  rather than of this app's request.

Neither favours one platform overall, and both clients agree on the
behaviour that matters: a plain sign-out KEEPS history, and erasing the
device destroys it — on Android by wiping every record and deleting the
Keystore key, so what is left is unopenable as well as gone.

⚠️ Also recorded: `Vault.history` prunes expired messages on the way out,
so disappearing messages are enforced on READ rather than by a timer
nothing runs — and it rewrites the record only when something actually
expired, so a read is not a write.

Services (AIM/ICQ) retired rather than left as a gap: not a goal for this
app (owner, 2026-09-04).

That leaves only the two post-quantum rows, and the note above them
already says why they are not a gap in effect: iOS's PQ files are inert
because CryptoKit exposes ML-KEM on iOS 26 and the app targets 16, so
neither client does post-quantum anything today. Closing it properly is
one decision for both clients, not an Android task.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-09-04 16:22:01 -04:00