Commit Graph
3 Commits
Author SHA1 Message Date
Paul Hitt eaf860e794 Advertise v3, now that there is evidence for the claim
PROTOCOL_VERSION read 2 with a note saying 3 would be wrong until ML-KEM was in
every ratchet step, "a separate piece of work". That work is done and proven
against another engine, so the number moves in the same change as the evidence
rather than ahead of it.

Until now the ratchet was inert in the field: iOS advertises 3 and gates on the
peer doing the same, so an iOS-to-Android session negotiated v2 and no message
ever carried a ratchet step, whatever either engine implemented.

🔴 A version is a claim other devices act on. Peers pin the highest proven
version and the pin is monotonic (§13.4), so a build that advertises 3 and
cannot honour it does not degrade — it strands every contact that believed it.

Three tests moved with it, and one is new. `a v2 registration publishes the
whole block` asserted 2 and now asserts the constant. `a capability signature
does not transfer between versions` edited a bundle to `proto = 3` to prove the
signature would not follow — a hardcoded neighbour that stopped testing anything
the moment the engine published 3, so it uses `PROTOCOL_VERSION + 1`. The v2
gating test needed a peer that has genuinely proven 2, which this engine no
longer produces: `copy(proto = 2)` is not enough, because the capability
signature commits to the version, so `publishedV2` re-signs for it.

The new one checks the published bundle claims 3 AND proves it. Bumping the
constant without the signature following would produce a bundle every peer
silently reads as v1, with nothing reporting an error anywhere.

Also: `the sealed blob reveals nothing` was the same coin flip as its iOS twin —
sealing ids 41 and 42 and searching the BASE64 for "41" and "42", about a 14%
chance of a meaningless failure. It fired during this run. The iOS one was fixed
this morning and this was missed because only one engine was looked at.

606 tests, 0 failures. Cross-engine: 56 passed, 0 failed.
2026-08-31 13:00:22 -04:00
Paul HittandClaude Opus 4.8 fefd87e482 Sealed group membership changes, and secrets that survive a reinstall
This had been sitting uncommitted and unbuilt. It builds.

`Session.updateSealedGroupMembers` is owner-only and refuses locally rather than
sending a request the relay would reject: we hold the owner's signing key only
if we created the group. The version must increase, because a roster signature
stays valid for ever — a stale one could otherwise be replayed to re-add
somebody who was just removed, with a signature that genuinely verifies.
Existing members keep their tags; only newcomers get fresh ones, since reusing
a tag would hand somebody the token another member had held.

The vault carries the group secrets through export and import. Without them a
restored device loses its sealed groups for good: the relay cannot say what you
are a member of — that is the point — so the tag is the only way to fetch a
group and the key the only way to read it. A backup with the messages but not
these restores a device that can see old conversations and can never rejoin the
groups they came from. Import fills gaps only, the same rule the names use.

Verified: :engine:test passes, :app:assembleDebug succeeds.

Closes #1

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-31 11:07:03 -04:00
Paul HittandClaude Opus 4.8 58fb20246e Sealed roster primitives (§8.9b)
The group key, the member tag, and the blob. Mirrors the Swift engine —
same JSON shape, same canonical signing string, same nonce||ct||tag box
layout, so a roster sealed on either platform opens on the other. The
Swift suite pins that with a vector produced by this code.

Tags are random rather than derived from the account id: anything derived
is a pseudonym the relay can link across groups, which is the social graph
again wearing a hash.

The encoding writes its keys in a fixed order — `JSONObject` promises none,
and a roster whose bytes depend on map iteration order is a roster whose
signature depends on it too.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-31 08:05:22 -04:00